I Took the Shingles Vaccine in 2016. Do I Need to Take It Again?

You lot know about how individuals gain control of the power of the Country and then abuse that power like quondam United states of america President George "Dubya" Bush?  "Dubya" started a war in Republic of iraq which was highly assisting for some Usa businesses.  He achieved this b y challenge Iraq had a nuclear weapons programme which was a serious world security threat when Republic of iraq did not and when it had already been bombed into oblivion by the war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'off-white game' for Bush United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland The Telegraph By Chrissy Iley 15 Feb 2011.

Think how Bush was supported by UK Premier Tony Blair who helped past persuading the British Parliament to join the US with faked "intelligence" of Iraq'due south weapons of mass devastation which did non exist only which Blair claimed could be deployed inside xl minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If yous call back that then you will know how these kinds of people dispense the media.  Observe how they persuade united states of america we are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they tin save us all if we trust them?

This trickery is non new.  It had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this twenty-four hours.

On CHS we wrote previously about how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated by vaccination when that bluntly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the disease came most as a effect of the interaction of three completely different factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living conditions, particularly nutrition and sanitation. The outcome cannot be attributable to the smallpox vaccine – whatsoever vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself not to have:

Small Pox – Big Prevarication – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

At that place was a nasty illness called smallpox and it did kill people long ago.

This was peculiarly the example when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for convenance and spreading disease: London's first park congenital after rich feared disease spread from slums Great britain The Independent Past Andy McSmith Friday 07 November 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized World.

The eye and upper classes needed to be reassured the State would proceed them safe from the threat of disease.  The majority of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could achieve this past ensuring the then truly "bang-up unwashed" masses would be vaccinated and the illness controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth but the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did non piece of work and sometimes killed equally many or more than the disease itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" still contracted the disease: Smallpox Bloodshed, Britain, U.s., Sweden.

At present you tin can read a relatively short but well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its role in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ past Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Doc – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX Bloodshed- UK, USA & SWEDEN

In the graphs below notice the large numbers of deaths caused by the smallpox vaccine itself.  By 1901 in the UK, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the disease dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished by vaccination, equally the medical "consensus" view tells us. Whatever vaccine which takes 100 years to "work" did not.  On any scientific analysis of the history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the reject in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the City of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the rest of the UK and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox death rates plummeted [see tabular array beneath].  Leicester'south arroyo also cost far less.

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" By J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Entire Book as .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

Tabular array 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Proper name.	Period.	Small-Pox.  Cases	Small-scale-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases
Nippon	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.8
British Army (United Kingdom)	1860-1908	i,355	96	7.1
British Ground forces (Republic of india)	1860-1908	ii,753	307	11.1
British Regular army (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	eight.eight
Royal Navy	1860-1908	2,909	234	8.0
Thou Totals and case fatality charge per unit per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.3
Leicester (since giving up vaccination)	1880-1908	1,206	61	5.1

Biggs said "In this comparison, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, so that they may be compared either fashion with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I ask, if the excessive small-pox fatality of Japan, of the British Ground forces, and of the Majestic Navy, are non due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would beget an interesting psychical report were we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would have soared with a corresponding result—but on the opposite side."

Tabular array 29.

Minor-Pox Epidemics, Price, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Small-Pox Cases	Minor-Pox Deaths	Fatality-rate Per Cent	Cost of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	nine,659	1,594	sixteen.l	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	3,417	377	eleven.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	7,066	688	ix.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	five.34	£2,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	thirty	4.10	£1,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Md

– Baronial 27, 2013

With the approaching flu season and the enthusiastic calls to utilize the influenza vaccine, y'all might be wondering where the idea of vaccination got its start. Where did the idea of injecting whole or bits of microbes and other substances into people in an endeavor to provide protection against contagious disease begin?

Many medical and history books nowadays a simple tale of the origin of vaccination. Near present the same basic tale of the brilliant observation of a uncomplicated country doctor and his courage in attempting to thwart a deadly and frightening disease of that time – smallpox, or every bit information technology was often called the speckled monster. In a recent and popular book, The Panic Virus, the author reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an eight-year old male child named James Phipps to test his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes's cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd made in Phipps's hands. The boy came downward with a slight fever, but nothing more. Later, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should have resulted in a full-blown, albeit balmy, case of the disease. Nothing happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox again; again, zip. [1]

Edward Jenner'southward idea eventually became known every bit vaccination, which is derived from the Latin word for cow – vacca. It was originally referred to as cowpoxing, but eventually the term vaccination was adopted. As the story goes, with this invention in place, smallpox would be tamed and the world would be freed from the terror of the illness.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is not different the archetype Greek legends of Theseus defeating the kid-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the deadly ophidian-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the brave hero defeating a mortiferous enemy. The Jenner fable has been reduced to a simple and memorable story of a hero defeating the mortiferous enemy, smallpox. Authors merits that with vaccination in place, "billions of lives" have been saved.[2]

Simply legendary heroes, specially those that are used to support a belief, reach an iconic condition while whatsoever unsavory aspects most the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well earlier the story of our hero. Information technology begins with the concept of using minor amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the artillery of good for you people. This idea was introduced to the Western earth past Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with knowledge of the practice of inoculation against smallpox, known every bit variolation. This type of inoculation was simply a matter of infecting a person with smallpox at a fourth dimension and in a setting of his choosing. The idea behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would do better against the affliction than if they contracted it at some mayhap less desirable time and place in the futurity.

The thought was embraced by the medical profession and enthusiastically practiced. Only considering of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an operation that could only be afforded by the wealthy.[3] The procedure did often help protect the individual that was inoculated, but there was still an estimated two-5% that died every bit a event.[iv,5] Still, this was an improvement compared to a 20-25% mortality rate in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[6] But, was the difference in mortality due to inoculation lonely? Or could it have had something to practise with the fact that the wealthy had better admission to more than nutritious nutrient and a cleaner environment than the majority of society?

There was one major and generally unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more deaths than at that place would have been naturally. In a 1764 commodity the writer recognized that smallpox was a contagious disease and that the practice of variolation would create new vectors to spread it. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years before the introduction of variolation to the 38 years after, and found that smallpox deaths had increased⎯not decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse bug, because it caused more deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably like the plague a contagious disease, what tends to stop the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends it; what tends to spread the contagion, tends to increase that danger; the practice of Inoculation patently tends to spread the contamination, for a contagious disease is produced by Inoculation where it would non otherwise take been produced; the place where it is thus produced becomes a center of contagion, whence it spreads non less fatally or widely than it would spread from a middle where the disease should happen in a natural style; these centers of contagion are manifestly multiplied very greatly past Inoculation . . .[7]

However, while the popularity of variolation varied, the problem of it spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had go a very lucrative procedure it was enthusiastically continued past most of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early on 1800s. Smallpox continued to be spread by this medically-sanctioned procedure.

Now enters the hero of our fable. Information technology was rumored among milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect one from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an 8-twelvemonth-old boy named James Phipps. He took disease affair that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with it. He later on deliberately exposed the kid to smallpox equally a exam to run into if he was protected by the cowpox inoculation. When the boy did non contract clinical smallpox, it was assumed that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results claiming lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with simply rumors to support his contention. While he promoted the utilize of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would be immune to smallpox, there were doctors of the time who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Doc-Convivial Society, Jenner was ridiculed over his exercise.

But he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned information technology than they laughed at it. The cow doctors could have told him of hundreds of cases where modest-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [8]

From the commencement there were bug with Jenner's procedure. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox matter obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were so tested by being inoculated with smallpox to see if the cowpox procedure had been constructive. All of them adult smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect whatsoever of them. Jenner received the written report but decided to ignore the results considering they were non in support of his theory.[9]

Vaccination was quickly embraced past many in the medical profession as the respond to combating smallpox. By 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the belief that the procedure would produce lifelong protection. The medical community continued to embrace Jenner'due south ideas amidst numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early reports indicated that there were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were still dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Kid was vaccinated past Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the end of the year 1799. A calendar month later information technology was inoculated with pocket-size-pox affair without result, and a few months afterward took confluent small-pox and died. ii. A woman-servant to Mr. Gamble, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had cow-pox in the casual fashion from milking. Seven years afterwards she became nurse to Yarmouth Hospital, where she caught minor-pox, and died. iii and 4. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, three years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted small-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . thirteen. The child of Mr. R died of small-pox in October 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were assured of its security. The vaccinator's name was curtained. 14. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam's office . . . died of small-pox a year subsequently vaccination.[10]

Reports through the early on 1800s began to accumulate showing vaccination was not living upwards to its promise to protect from smallpox. A report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of minor-pox later on vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[11] Note that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an 18% fatality rate and is substantially the aforementioned fatality rate as smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This high fatality rate along with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a direct challenge to this new and highly lauded medical procedure.

Some other article in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering under Small Pox, who have previously undergone Vaccination by the about skillful practitioners, is at present alarmingly groovy.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Brown, a surgeon with thirty years of experience in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an commodity discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no one in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practice." Just later on vaccinating 1,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His experience was that, afterward vaccination, people still could contract and even die from smallpox, and that he could no longer support the practice.[thirteen]

Like today, surgeons and doctors of the time were handsomely compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a tendency to comprehend it as a new grade of income. Information technology is therefore quite significant for a doctor to have spoken out against it equally Dr. Brown did.

Continued observations showed that smallpox could still infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could besides be infected.

. . . during the years 1820, 1, and, 2 [1820-1822] there was a not bad hubbub about the small-pox. It broke out with the great epidemic to the north . . . It pressed close to habitation to Dr. Jenner himself . . . It attacked many who had had small-pox earlier, and often severely; almost to death; and of those who had been vaccinated, it left some alone, merely brutal upon great numbers.[14]

William Cobbett was a farmer, journalist, and English pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote most the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to be an unproven and fraudulent medical practise. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons moo-cow-poxed past JENNER HIMSELF, accept taken the real small-pox afterwards, and take either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![15]

During this time vaccine material was the "humanized" form, which meant that textile was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the side by side person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, but as failures increased there was a belief that the vaccine had lost its original supposed potency, and in that location were calls to obtain fresh material directly from cows.[16]

While the legend maintained that the vaccine material came from cows, Jenner actually believed the material originated from an infectious condition of horses called the "grease." From this and other beliefs, in that location were many attempts to recreate an original cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was simply smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow made into a new disease.[18] This faulty belief would result in the creation of more smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a man who died from smallpox and inoculated it onto a cow'southward udder. He then took pus from that cow and used it to vaccinate people. A large smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[19] A afterwards research determined that this was naught more than the old practice of smallpox inoculation.[20]

Not only was vaccination failing and causing smallpox epidemics, just there were besides reports of deaths from other causes shortly after vaccination. For example, a skin status called erysipelas was a especially prolonged and painful manner to die.

. . . a male child from Somers-boondocks, aged 5 years, "pocket-size-pox confluent, unmodified (ix days)." He had been vaccinated at the age of 4 months; one cicatrix . . . the married woman of a labourer, from Lambeth, aged 22 years, "pocket-sized-pox confluent, unmodified (viii days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; two expert cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, aged 10 weeks, and the son of a saccharide bakery, anile 13 weeks, died of "general erysipelas after vaccination, effusion of the brain."[21]

Because arm-to-arm vaccination was being used, other diseases could exist spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke earlier the Academy at Paris.

First I rejected the idea that syphilis could be transplanted past vaccination. Just facts accumulated more and more, and at present I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis by means of the vaccine. I do this very reluctantly. At present I do non hesitate longer to acknowledge and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

Equally it became increasingly clear throughout the 1800s to more doctors and citizens that vaccination was not what it was promised to be, refusals increased. In society to bargain with this, the judicial system intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a ready of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did nothing to curb the trouble of smallpox. Information from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting effectually 1837, there were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the great 1872 epidemic. Afterwards 1855, at that place were farther smallpox epidemics in 1859-sixty, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the almost astringent smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These echo smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted past Massachusetts in 1855 had no effect at all (Graph i). In fact, more than people died in the twenty years later on the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the twenty years earlier.

Graph 1: Boston smallpox mortality rate from 1841 to 1880.

By this signal, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection against smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination made smallpox less likely to kill or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were then made for revaccination. Claims were made that revaccination had to be performed anywhere from yearly to every x years.[25]

While the majority of the medical profession supported vaccination, there were those that spoke out against the procedure. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent medico of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were beingness made by vaccinators. Immense financial gain combined with the force of law created the perfect environment that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western world.

The public vaccinators have received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 alone they amounted to £54,727, and in the present year they will get well-nigh a quarter one thousand thousand. Other sums, as well, which I cannot name, have been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has e'er a quack remedy produced so much proceeds?

[26]

In England, governmental control strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. However, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics continued to occur. A great pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, even those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian state of war there were twenty-3 1000 four hundred and threescore-nine cases of small-pox in that regular army. The London Lancet of July 15, 1871 said:

Of ix one thousand 3 hundred and ninety-two small-pox patients in London hospitals, six thou eight hundred and fifty-four had been vaccinated. Seventeen and half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole country more than 1 hundred and twenty-ii thousand vaccinated persons have suffered from small-pox . . . Official returns from Germany show that between 1870 and 1885 one million vaccinated persons died from pocket-sized-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine prophylactic, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal liberty and liberty through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine movement. People began to resist the government and chose to pay fines. Some even accustomed imprisonment rather than allowing vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backlash culminated in the great sit-in in Leicester England, in 1885. That same yr Leicester's authorities, which had pushed for vaccination through the use of fines and jail time, was replaced with a new government that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. By 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to 10%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a cheap and effective means that eliminated the need for vaccination. However, at that place were dire predictions from the bulk of the medical customs that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the depression vaccination charge per unit would event in a terrible "massacre," particularly in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the bulk of the town'due south residents were steadfast in their belief that vaccination was not necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would somewhen exist plagued with disaster never did come up to pass. Low vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[30] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths (Graph 2). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed as the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were high.

The experience of unvaccinated Leicester is an eye-opener to the people and an heart-sore to the pro-vaccinists the world over. Here is a great manufacturing town having a population of most a quarter of a million, which has demonstrated by a crucial test of an feel extending over a menstruum of more than than a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to modest-pox and far less afflicted past that disease since it abandoned vaccination than it was at a time when ninety-five per cent of its births were vaccinated and its adult population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was often promoted as a safe procedure, it often acquired sickness or even death. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than than 1,600 in England (Graph 3). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the aforementioned (Graph 4).

Graph ii: Leicester England smallpox mortality rate vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph iii: England and Wales total deaths from cowpox and other effects of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph 4: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the stop of the 1800s, smallpox inverse its character. Later the summertime of 1897, the severe blazon of smallpox with its high death rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the United states of america. Smallpox turned from a disease that killed 1 in 5 of its victims to one that just killed anywhere from ane in l and later to equally depression as 1 in 380. The disease could still kill, simply having become so much milder, it was frequently mistaken for various other pox infections or skin eruptions.

During 1896 a very mild type of smallpox began to prevail in the South and afterward gradually spread over the country. The mortality was very low and it [smallpox] was commonly at kickoff mistaken for craven pox. . .[32]

The author of a 1913 article in The Journal of Infectious Diseases presented a tabular array showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox death charge per unit was around 20%, every bit it had been historically. The table too showed that after 1896 the death rate brutal off rapidly, starting with 6% in 1897 to as depression as 0.26% past 1908. As the balmy form of smallpox replaced the classic type, smallpox could exist difficult to tell from chickenpox, which was, by this time, considered a balmy disease of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a minor communicable illness of childhood, and is chiefly important because it frequently gives rise to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very difficult to differentiate clinically.[33]

Past the 1920s it was recognized that the new grade of smallpox produced little in the style of symptoms, even though few had been vaccinated.

Individual cases, or even epidemics, occur in which, although in that location has been no protection by vaccination, the course of the disease is extremely mild. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent, and the ramble symptoms mild or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely low vaccine coverage rate, there was never a resurgence of smallpox. Even though smallpox was not a major result, the practice of smallpox vaccination continued from the time of the final smallpox death in the United States in 1948 up until 1963. This resulted in an estimated 5,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 study detailed the cases of 9 children in which two died of a pare condition due to vaccination, now being termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this disease was estimated by the authors to exist betwixt ane in twenty,000 to 1 in 100,000 with a fatality charge per unit of 4 to 40%.[35] Notwithstanding, they acknowledged that nearly cases were non reported and there was no accurate accounting on this consequence of vaccination. There were also an estimated 200 to 300 deaths every bit the upshot of smallpox vaccination, while during the same time at that place had but been one smallpox death in 1948.[36]

The last smallpox death in the United States following an importation occurred in 1948, but since that time there have been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is still occurring today, as recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected past his armed forces father afterward the begetter was vaccinated. After a prolonged admission, and a calendar week of experimental treatments including immune globulin from donor blood and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The female parent as well required treatment and virus was found all over the firm.[38]

Because of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 study thought that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could really accept been even college. This study merely examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the Usa. If the deaths were this high in a country with a mod health-intendance organization, what was the total number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the present across the entire world?

There were those in the medical community who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which once had the suffrage of the nation has now hardly a serious supporter. Nosotros are aback to jettison the idea completely and possibly afraid that if nosotros did the accident of some future epidemic might put united states of america in the wrong. Nosotros prefer to let compulsory vaccination die a natural decease and are relieved that the general public is not curious enough to need an inquest. In the meantime our attention is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this time with vaccination every bit virtually the only medically promoted way to deal with illness, there were doctors finding amazing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a mutual food product that is made through fermentation of a variety of sources. An 1877 article described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. K. Oliphant, Chiliad.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the commodity on the use of Acetic acid in reddish fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" every bit practical to small pox. Dr. Roth first claimed wonderful success in treatment regarding vinegar more than reliable as a prophylactic in pocket-size-pox than Belladonna in ruby fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the sick and to the exposed two table-spoonfuls of vinegar, afterward breakfast and at evening, for fourteen days. Few persons thus treated took the disease at all. None who adopted the prophylactic treatment died, while among those nether ordinary treatment the mortality was as usual.[40]

In 1899 Dr. Howe besides demonstrated vinegar'due south ability to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to take care of other people with smallpox without fear of contracting the disease. The writer notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective against smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar as a existent preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should be used three or four times a day to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretary of the Western Reserve Historical Society, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the peachy men who for a century past have been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, now comes to the front in the newspapers with the real preventative. "Whatever person who has been exposed need accept no fright of smallpox if he will take two or three tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar three or four times a day." The discussion may now be regarded as closed, and smallpox at last is conquered![42]

Apple cider vinegar might seem silly, simply merely because most people take been conditioned to take the age-old prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, disease-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected beast's (unremarkably a cow) abdomen, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the human arm with a metallic prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier now?

Scurvy is a disease that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or just an extremely poor or unbalanced diet. Vitamin C is essential for the formation of healthy collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in skin, basic, and claret vessels and also gives support to internal organs. In scurvy, the trunk is not able to generate acceptable collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve as mortar holding cells together and, as a result, literally comes unglued and falls apart.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Department of Male monarch'southward Higher, described the poor nutrition of gilt miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fat, coffee, and alcohol while working long, hard days under the unrelenting California sunday. The vitamin C-deficient diet led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent among the gold miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, as living almost entirely upon fried bacon or fat pork and flour made into concoction-cakes, and fried in the fat, which completely saturates it. This is washed down with copious librations of strong coffee, and large quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the diet of thousands for months, under a scorching sun, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the aforementioned fourth dimension subjected to the nearly intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Gold Rush of the mid-1800s, an estimated ten,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Ceremonious War twice as many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases every bit those killed in battle.[44] For instance, the causes of death listed for Indiana soldiers buried at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy straight accounted for at to the lowest degree two-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the next common crusade of expiry, with the infamous diseases such as smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for only a minor fraction. Those who were killed in actual battle or who died as a result of their wounds accounted but for 1 percent of the full deaths.

Other big infectious killers such as ruby fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (likewise known as pertussis) all profoundly declined during this fourth dimension to where they were either completely eliminated or considered balmy childhood illnesses by the mid-1900s. This massive decline of 99% of deaths in whooping cough and measles occurred before vaccines or antibiotics were available (Graph 5 & vi).

Graph v: England and Wales whooping cough mortality charge per unit from 1838 to 1978.

Graph 6: England and Wales measles mortality charge per unit from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a land medico making a discovery that saved the world from the devastation of smallpox is a fundamental medical belief that continues to be echoed past indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine faith. But the true history shows united states of america a dissimilar reality.

The brand name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the globe psyche as something to protect someone from an illness. This belief spawned off numerous other ideas using the aforementioned notion of injecting whole or parts of disease thing into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific disease. The reality of vaccination is zippo close to the myth.

Other extremely effective alternative methods of sanitation, nutrition, apple cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and take since vanished from societal collective memory. Instead we were left with the mythical history of Jenner'south nifty discovery and the continued onslaught of unsafe vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are now a regular matter from cradle to grave, all in the name of supposedly healthier people. Now that the mantle has been pulled dorsum on the origins of vaccination, do more than and more vaccines seem like a good idea to you?

More information on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping cough, and lost remedies can exist found in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk'south volume "Dissolving Illusions" which can be found on amazon.com

Bibliography:
i.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
ii.Science the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
three.Victor C. Vaughan, Doctor, Epidemiology and Public Health, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
4.Frederick F. Cartwright, Disease and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
five.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the Get-go Planting, Progressive Improvements and Present Country of the British Settlements of North-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
vi.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Knowledge and the 'Opening' of Japan, Stanford University Press, 2007, p.179.
7."The Practice of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman'south Magazine and Historical Chronicle, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
8.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Case Confronting Vaccination, Goddard'due south Rooms, Gloucester, January 25, 1896, p. 12.
9.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
x.William Scott Tebb, Doc, A Century of Vaccination and What it Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
11."Vaccination by Deed of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Periodical and Review, vol. Viii, July-December, 1817, p. 95.
13.Mr. Thomas Dark-brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Present Land of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, Book Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
xiv."Observations past Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. Two, 1829, p. 583.
15.William Cobbett, Advice to Young Men and (Incidentally) to Young Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
16.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Present State of Vaccination in France," The Lancet, vol. Ii, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Medico-chirurgical review and journal of practical medicine, vol. 20, 1834, p. 504.
18.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Communication and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical journal, vol. 4, 1834, p. 796.
xix.Ephraim Cutter, Medico, "Partial Report on the Production of Vaccine Virus in the United States," Transactions of the American Medical Association, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
xx.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning Relate, Wednesday, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Report of Legislation Regarding Public Health in the State of New York and Massachusetts," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. iv, February 1909, p. fifty-51.
24."Small-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Periodical, vol. CIV, no. 6, February 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Sentinel, April 1911, vol. 19, no. four, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.G. Due west. Harman, MD, "A Physician'south Statement Against the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Brief: A Monthly Journal of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. 1, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June 1, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Sit-in Against Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Apr 16, 1885, p. 380.
30.J. Westward. Hodge, Md, "Prophylaxis to be Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Not past the Propagation of Disease," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Periodical, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. xv.
31.J. West. Hodge, MD, "How Pocket-size-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Magazine, vol. III, no. 16, January, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles V. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Infectious Disease every bit Shown by the History of Smallpox in the Usa," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 2, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Factory Lancaster, An introduction to the practice of preventive medicine, C.V. Mosby Visitor, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Cost Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Volume 1, W.B. Saunders Visitor, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds MD and Howard A. Joos MD, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, Baronial 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, University of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. 10.
38.Maggie Play tricks, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological back-number," Lancet, January 1, 1938, pp. 48-49.
40."Acetic Acid in Scarlet Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Journal of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Scientific discipline, vol. 1, no. i, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Prevent Smallpox," The Critique, January 15, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Journal of Medicine, vol. VI, no. i, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Wellness. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Section of King'southward Higher," Medical Times, vol. 23, January 4 to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Benefit to Mankind, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), November 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Health Safety, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Prophylactic, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, government, Health, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, scientific discipline, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines |

malonelievaight.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share this post